My Holy Book

life's work:

Life and How to Survive It (according to Mr. Tan)

From a wise and very funny Singaporean. (Thanks Sandra Yu for the tip)

“Rather, I exhort you to love another human being. It may seem odd for me to tell you this. You may expect it to happen naturally, without deliberation. That is false. Modern society is anti-love. We’ve taken a microscope to everyone to bring out their flaws and shortcomings. It far easier to find a reason not to love someone, than otherwise. Rejection requires only one reason. Love requires complete acceptance. It is hard work – the only kind of work that I find palatable.

Loving someone has great benefits. There is admiration, learning, attraction and something which, for the want of a better word, we call happiness. In loving someone, we become inspired to better ourselves in every way. We learn the truth worthlessness of material things. We celebrate being human. Loving is good for the soul.

Loving someone is therefore very important, and it is also important to choose the right person. Despite popular culture, love doesn’t happen by chance, at first sight, across a crowded dance floor. It grows slowly, sinking roots first before branching and blossoming. It is not a silly weed, but a mighty tree that weathers every storm.

You will find, that when you have someone to love, that the face is less important than the brain, and the body is less important than the heart.

You will also find that it is no great tragedy if your love is not reciprocated. You are not doing it to be loved back. Its value is to inspire you.”

‘Consumer sovereignty’ and the ‘Colonized mind’ are positive and negative versions of the same fantasy: a world of imaginary people with no histiory and no social ties, either by happy individuality or by unhappy susceptibility to manipulation

The balance of power held by agrofood corporations can shift only if workers and consumers ally with environmentalists and social justice movements, as citizens, to create and institute democratic and appropriately scaled food policies.

—Harriet Friedman, Food Politics: New Dangers, New Perspectives, p. 28 & 32

Locavore Mom-and-pop vs. big-box stores in the food desert »

Unfortunately, we will get what we measure. The $400 million that the Obama administration has set aside to create greater food access in these so-called food deserts will likely go to attracting full-service grocery franchises that heap upon our children megatons of empty calories like those in high-fructose corn syrup and corn oil — yes, the very products that emerge from Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack’s own great state of Iowa. But the profits made in those big-box stores will drain away from our neighborhoods and communities, bound for distant corporate headquarters, further impoverishing most food producers and consumers.

Changing Roles in the Local Food Economy

“The DIY craze has shacked up with the local food movement to produce some inspiring examples of entrepreneurialism: Mason jar magic made by suburban fruit salvagers powered by pedals; workshops on wild-crafting, axe-making, rooftop bees and city-living chickens; lecture series that focus on the how-to rather than just why, when and where; and more.

But we can’t just take pictures of these ingenious innovators for the glossies and call our work finished. We have so much creativity (and cabbage) fermenting at the intersection of craft, food, and agriculture–now we need to connect the dots.

Our spirit and gumption produce marketable ideas and we must distill the unique and visionary experiences into capacity-building structures to create long-term stability for our farmers,  eaters, and land. Our pet projects and pop-ups can morph into replicable systems, operations, and communications strategies so our movement can evolve into a true revolution.”

From Olivia’s Sargeant’s post on Civil Eats

In the light of climate change, gender considerations, and effective pro-poor policies there have developed several policy preferences, one I call productivist and the other I call holist. One focuses mainly on increasing production, the other looks at the ecology, economy and social concerns of agriculture in development. My emphasis has been on the latter sustainable approach, whether focused on anti-trust or global food security, it fully appears to me that an appreciation of complexity calls for a long-term, nuanced approach.

Dave Andrews, Food and Water Watch, Interview May 7, 2010

http://www.antemedius.com/content/conversation-dave-andrews

Without attention to such conditions, localism can subordinate material and cultural differences to a mythical community interest. The notion that communities will make better decisions about food systems is based on an expectation of a fluid cooperation among groups with quite different interests.

—Patricia Allen, Reweaving Food Security 1999

We suddenly find ourselves in a very odd and in some ways exciting, but also uncomfortable new place. No longer holding a sign outside on the granite steps of the USDA or the capital, but inside, with a seat at the table. The challenge now is to figure out what to say.

—Michael Pollan — in a speech to Long Now institute